First off, congrats to the Phils and Restless Native. Good on ya!
As for politics and economics, I am guessing that you are like me and tend to gravitate to sources of info that reflect your own leanings. I am more likely to read the WSJ than the NYT, for example, and not just because I am in finance. This kind of behavior does tend to risk a distorted view of the world, so I would like to suggest the idea of "coffee breaks" - the posting of one or two articles a day that people of the opposite political persuasion ought to read, even if it infuriates them to do so. I would love everyone to participate, but especially Aztec, since he's probably my polar opposite in lot of politics, and since I rarely spend time on Slate or MSNBC.com, I probably miss some valuable discussion.
Anyway, here is my post for the day. It echoes a lot of the concerns I was trying to speak to about Obama, albeit in a much more articulate fashion.
Wednesday: Architecture Billings Index
10 hours ago
1 comment:
The Economist endorses Obama. Good reasoning behind it. I was impressed that Obama called in Volker. Less inspired by Rubin and Summers.
If he wins, I hope the Economist and Yo Gabba are correct in believing he will govern from the center. I don't.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2008/10/the_economist_endorses.cfm
Post a Comment